It’s becoming more and more evident that morality is not something we construct like architecture; instead, morality is something we discover like archaeology. Objective morality is like an artifact that has always existed, and science is continuing to verify this as, philosophically speaking, a properly basic belief. To say, then, that morality is nothing more than an arbitrary social construct created by social contract is not only improper, but also immoral in the face of overwhelming subjective, epistemological experiences and objective, ontological evidences. Our very being and essence is decisively not grounded in temporal beings and ideas; it is definitively grounded in something much more firm and infinite. Know then, that when life begins in conception, that one enters into judication of the eternal legislature of which all men have fallen short of. To deny this will be to deny the legitimacy of scientific inquiry. To deny this will be to deny your own metacognition of objective morality, of which a three month old baby can much more readily testify to.

http://www.cnn.com/2014/02/13/living/what-babies-know-anderson-cooper-parents/index.html